One of the chief advantages enjoyed by lawyers and litigating parties such as insurance companies and banks is an intimate knowledge of the processes and procedures of law, which they gain through training and repeat experience.
Those processes can all be assigned, organized, and maintained in a simple workflow process. Thus achieving informed parties, better performance managed, assignments are kept on track, and communication between departments is run smoothly.
Large corporations, governments, and businesses that litigate as part of their normal operations can adopt strategic plans including legal steps to further their long-range interests. Such litigants plan to be involved in lawsuits. They arrange their business affairs to have the best chance of winning. Businesses may also use litigation as marketing by other means when they protect their patents and trademarks in court and challenge those of their competitors. Frequent litigants can also plan their interaction with courts to obtain the optimum results.
In scenarios where there is a conflict of interest, they proposed that the parties should have a high degree of control over the process, but not over the final decision. In situations where the dispute is primarily a conflict of facts, they suggested both elements of control are best left with an impartial third party. This type of situation can be described with a flowchart. By choosing to present visually a conflict, with a flowchart, interested parties can save time and take an effective decision.